Fix for metadata entries table for MOR tables containing Delete Files.#1902
Merged
Fokko merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom Apr 16, 2025
Merged
Fix for metadata entries table for MOR tables containing Delete Files.#1902Fokko merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Fokko merged 3 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
This fixes #1884 @kevinjqliu Can this fix be reviewed once please? |
Fokko
reviewed
Apr 14, 2025
Contributor
Fokko
left a comment
Fokko
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for working on this @guptaakashdeep, that's a great catch 🙌 It looks good, I just suggested a bit more concise syntax. LMKWYT
Contributor
|
@guptaakashdeep The CI should be fixed? Can you pull in |
Contributor
Author
|
@Fokko Alright done. |
Fokko
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2025
Contributor
|
Thanks @guptaakashdeep 🙌 |
Fokko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2025
#1902) <!-- Thanks for opening a pull request! --> <!-- In the case this PR will resolve an issue, please replace ${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID} below with the actual Github issue id. --> Closes #1884 # Rationale for this change table.inspect.entries() fails when table is MOR table and has Delete Files present in it. Iceberg MOR Table is created via Apache Spark 3.5.0 with Iceberg 1.5.0 and it's being read via PyIceberg 0.9.0 using StaticTable.from_metadata() # Are these changes tested? Yes # Are there any user-facing changes? No <!-- In the case of user-facing changes, please add the changelog label. -->
gabeiglio
pushed a commit
to Netflix/iceberg-python
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2025
apache#1902) <!-- Thanks for opening a pull request! --> <!-- In the case this PR will resolve an issue, please replace ${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID} below with the actual Github issue id. --> Closes apache#1884 # Rationale for this change table.inspect.entries() fails when table is MOR table and has Delete Files present in it. Iceberg MOR Table is created via Apache Spark 3.5.0 with Iceberg 1.5.0 and it's being read via PyIceberg 0.9.0 using StaticTable.from_metadata() # Are these changes tested? Yes # Are there any user-facing changes? No <!-- In the case of user-facing changes, please add the changelog label. -->
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1884
Rationale for this change
table.inspect.entries() fails when table is MOR table and has Delete Files present in it. Iceberg MOR Table is created via Apache Spark 3.5.0 with Iceberg 1.5.0 and it's being read via PyIceberg 0.9.0 using StaticTable.from_metadata()
Are these changes tested?
Yes
Are there any user-facing changes?
No